top of page

Target’s Pride Month Controversy 

Written by Kourosh Harbottle 

Edited by Annika Lilja

Upon the conclusion of Pride Month, retail giant Target witnessed a noticeable decline in sales due to a backlash emerging from their respective Pride Month campaign. The corporation had introduced a comprehensive range of Pride themed merchandise and marketing initiatives aimed at expressing solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community. While this was a move to embrace inclusivity, it did quite the opposite, sparking controversy. Sales dropped 5% in the April to June period compared with the same time last year, resulting in the company's first fall in six years. 

Target’s campaign was received with polarized responses from the consumer base. It saw damage to in-store displays and the clothing merchandise, which included a wide selection of items, including clothing decorated with rainbows, "gender fluid" mugs and children's books titled "Pride 1,2,3" and "I'm not a girl". While many applauded the corporation for standing with the LGBTQ+ community, a significant amount accused Target of attempting to capitalize on Pride Month merely for profit and even corrupting children's minds, sparking considerable outrage. The backlash arises in a context of widespread concerns across the nation regarding the exposure of children to sexual themes and topics. Parents, expressing their outrage, have consistently attended school board meetings to voice their objections to the exposure of such content to children within the public school system. This resulted in calls for boycotts across various social media platforms.

Target later removed a large portion of these items from some stores over concerns about staff safety, a corporate spokesperson described the situation as “threats impacting our team members’ sense of safety and wellbeing while at work” (NBC News). This controversy swiftly translated into severe economic consequences for Target, negatively impacting its sales in the weeks following Pride Month. This downturn in sales had a ripple effect, further affecting the corporation’s quarterly financial performance and shareholder value.

The predicament experienced by Target offers invaluable insights when viewed through economic concepts. Firstly, the concept of consumer demand is crucial. Consumer demand encapsulates the total quantity of a particular good or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at various price points. For Target, the adverse consumer response in the wake of their Pride campaign equated to a significant reduction in the demand for their products. The palpable shift in consumer preferences and perception towards Target’s brand identity played a pivotal role in influencing their purchasing decisions, subsequently affecting the retailer's overall market slump. In addition, this incident highlights the precarious balance company's must maintain while initiating socially sensitive campaigns. Companies must meticulously align their marketing outputs with consumer sentiments and societal values, as any deviation can lead to shifts in demand, affecting market equilibrium and ultimately impacting overall profit. 

Target's sales drop after Pride Month demonstrates how basic microeconomic ideas like consumer demand work in real life. This situation highlights the complex relationship between consumer perception, demand, and corporate financial performance. With today’s unpredictable and volatile market, businesses need a solid grasp of these economic principles to handle problems effectively and keep people interested in purchasing their products. 



“Target Sales Suffer after Pride Month Backlash - BBC News.” BBC News, BBC News, 16 Aug. 2023, 

Masih, Niha. “Target Pulls Some LGBTQ+ Merchandise from Pride Collection after Threats - The Washington Post.” Washington Post, The Washington Post, 24 May 2023, boycott/

"Target pulls some Pride collection items after threats to employees" - NBC News,


bottom of page